The Game of Persuasion 1.
Introduction to Philosophy Jeremy Anderson, Ph. Presenting an Argument in Standard Form. Jeremy Anderson Introduction to standard form Philosophers usually present their arguments to us in prose.
This is not always the best form for understanding an argument. It is often helpful to take an argument from its original prose statement and lay out its premise s and conclusion s -- i. I will provide two examples of how to do this: First let's look at the few simple rules of standard form.
An argument is presented as a list of numbered steps. Each step contains only one proposition -- a single declarative sentence. Usually it is either a premise or a conclusion, but sometimes a single proposition writing a presenting arguments be both the conclusion of one argument and a premise of another.
An example of this is step 4 in the first example below. Premises must come before the conclusions they are supposed to support. On assignments submitted for credit, academic integrity is important.
Here is a link to DePauw's academic integrity policy.
So, if you are putting an argument in standard form for a paper you will submit for credit, there's one more rule: The argument's source is cited. If an author's words are used which is optional or closely paraphrased, put them within quotation marks.
We will be careful to keep the author's words within quotation marks whenever we use them: It is highly unlikely that such a system would have come about and would continue to hang together from the purely random motions of particles. It would be much less surprising if it were the result of conscious design from a super-intelligent creator.
To do this, I simply go through Bailey's paragraph and start a new line after each claim, and then number the resulting list. Some correction of punctuation is needed: Notice that we have kept Bailey's words in quotation marks and kept the citation.
These are needed to maintain academic integrity. Also, notice how this example follows the other rules of standard form: We now have a series of numbered steps. Each step contains only one proposition: The premises come before the conclusions they are supposed to support.
We didn't have to re-order of the statements because the prose argument was written that way. The conclusions are signaled by "therefore" and "so".
But we are not yet finished.Writing your first Django app, part 3¶. This tutorial begins where Tutorial 2 left off. We’re continuing the Web-poll application and will focus on creating the public interface – “views.”.
Rhetorical functions in academic writing: Arguing and discussing There are two main methods of presenting an argument, and in general the one you choose will depend on exactly your task the arguments to support your own view, with evidence, reasons and examples.
Suggestions about the reading, writing, and discussion required in philosophy courses. Writing an Argument The purpose of argument writing is to present a position and to have an audience adopt or at least seriously consider your argument.
Creative writing, by definition, involves being ‘creative’: making things up, letting your imagination run regardbouddhiste.com are about being factual and objective, communicating ideas and arguments in the clearest way possible and attempting to enhance the reader’s knowledge, rather than their imagination.
Typhoid Mary: Captive to the Public's Health [Judith Walzer Leavitt] on regardbouddhiste.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. She was an Irish immigrant cook. Between and , she infected twenty-two New Yorkers with typhoid fever through her puddings and cakes; one of them died.
Tracked down through epidemiological detective work.